Industry Focus

Project Control in Mechanical & Plant Engineering

Long project durations, engineers and fitters shared across projects, purchased parts on the critical path: projects in mechanical and plant engineering play by their own rules. Steering them reliably takes more than schedules and Excel.
Linetrack project control for mechanical and plant engineering

In short

Project management in mechanical and plant engineering means steering long-running engineering projects with shared resources across design, manufacturing, and assembly – including suppliers on the critical path. What matters is a connected view of schedules, capacity, and dependencies across all parallel projects. Linetrack from Stuttgart has already supported over 4,000 completed industrial projects – in use at Schnaithmann, Stoll Gruppe, bavius, and LANG Technik.

StadlerSTOLLSchnaithmannMSGLANG TECHNIKInVENTerKSKSCHIRMACHERVOWEMAKrüger & SaleckerBAVIUSSAMALPHA PLANSCHAUENBURGGRÜBL Automatisierungstechnik GmbHbpmHywaxPGA AnlagenbauKSK AutomationProla Automation
StadlerSTOLLSchnaithmannMSGLANG TECHNIKInVENTerKSKSCHIRMACHERVOWEMAKrüger & SaleckerBAVIUSSAMALPHA PLANSCHAUENBURGGRÜBL Automatisierungstechnik GmbHbpmHywaxPGA AnlagenbauKSK AutomationProla Automation

4000 +

completed
industrial projects

270 +

parallel projects
at a single customer

1512 +

projects managed
in parallel

10

working days to the
first project of your own

*Figures from live Linetrack implementations, as of August 2026.

The reality in mechanical engineering

Why project-driven
mechanical engineers lose the overview

Not because people plan badly – but because planning has grown over years into disconnected Excel lists with no shared context. Four patterns repeat in almost every mechanical and plant engineering company.

Excel silos grown over time

Every department keeps its own list, and the same resource is named differently in three different files. There is no data-driven basis for decisions – connections between projects stay invisible because the complexity swallows them. In practice, Linetrack customers retire several such separate planning lists at once – four out of five of them plain Excel files.

Pattern for problem cards.

Decisions made by gut feeling

Delivery dates get promised without anyone being able to say how loaded design, programming, assembly, and commissioning really are over the coming weeks. Discussions run on subjective impressions, not on data. Lack of transparency is the trigger every single Linetrack customer named before adopting the system.

Pattern for problem cards.

Fully booked and underutilized at the same time

Orders get turned down with "we're fully booked" – while hours sit idle in other departments. Without a cross-project view, nobody knows where capacity is actually free and where the real bottleneck sits.

Pattern for problem cards.

Manual agreements nobody else sees

What two department heads agree on stays between them. For everyone else it's invisible. Hours spent maintaining lists keep the system limping along – yet it's never actually up to date.

Pattern for problem cards.

A different rulebook

Why project management in mechanical engineering
works differently than elsewhere

Projects in mechanical and plant engineering follow different rules than construction or IT projects. Three traits make the difference – and explain why standard project management fails here.

Many locations instead of one site

In construction there is one shared place of work – the site. In mechanical engineering, a project spreads across internal departments, the customer, and the entire supply chain. Design, electrical design, programming, controls engineering, purchasing, manufacturing, assembly, service, and documentation all interlock – in different places, at different times.

Pattern für Problem-Cards.

Many planners instead of one team

In agency and marketing projects, one team plans its own project. In mechanical and plant engineering, many departments with their own planners work in parallel on a single project – design, programming, manufacturing, assembly, commissioning. Each plans its own part, and all the parts have to fit together. This collaborative, multi-planner setup is exactly what overwhelms simple project tools.

Pattern für Problem-Cards.

Change is the norm

New customer requests, breakdowns, delayed suppliers: in mechanical engineering, a project keeps changing. The more custom the solution and the less it resembles series production, the more activities interlock across departments and people – and the faster any static plan goes out of date.

Pattern für Problem-Cards.

Point solutions that only solve
half the problem

Many project management systems ship with an enormous feature set – one that's never remotely used in practice. The reasons are always the same: poor usability, long load times, no connection to the existing system landscape, high costs, inadequate training, and a rollout that never really works. The result is an expensive system nobody uses.

Linetrack came about differently: founders Michael and Thomas Sindlinger are mechanical engineers themselves. Linetrack grew out of exactly these problems – we understand our customers' challenges from firsthand experience, not from a market analysis. And we don't leave our customers alone during rollout. Linetrack is rolled out together with the company so it works across every department later on – step by step, without overwhelming the organization. That's exactly where most project management rollouts fail. For us, it's the core of how we work.

Few mechanical engineering companies start from zero. Most already have tools – they just each solve only part of the problem. MS Project gets used as the master planner and still remains a silo. Detailed scheduling systems cover fine planning and sit isolated next to it. What's missing is the connection between the systems. More than every second Linetrack customer already had a PM system in place before switching – it didn't solve the pain, because the departments kept planning in Excel anyway. The multi-project management software comparison shows which system categories exist and where their limits lie. What that implies for choosing a tool is covered on the project management software for mechanical and plant engineering page.

Previous tools
UsabilityComplex, barely-used features
SpeedLong load times
System integrationSilo, no connection
CostHigh, often oversized
Rollout & adoptionOften fails, poor training
Industry fitGeneric, outside the industry
UsabilitySimple, purpose-built planning workflows
SpeedFast and lightweight
System integrationConnected to the system landscape
CostSized to actual need
Rollout & adoptionPhased, guided rollout
Industry fitBuilt by mechanical engineers

How that guided rollout actually runs – from the baseline assessment in the initial consultation through the planning simulation to the migration of live plans – is set out on the implementation page.

A mechanical engineering project from design to final acceptance

Across the entire lifecycle – every phase with its own schedules, resources, and dependencies in a single system.

A project in mechanical and plant engineering runs through many phases – from design through purchasing, manufacturing, and assembly to commissioning and final acceptance. Each phase has its own schedules, ties up its own resources, and depends on the one before it: if design slips, everything after it shifts too.

This is exactly where separate tools fall short. They cover individual phases but not the continuous flow. In Linetrack, the entire project lifecycle lives in one system – with all dependencies between phases. That makes it visible at any time how a delay in manufacturing affects assembly and commissioning dates, and which resources are needed when.

DesignQuotation design and detailed engineering of the machine
PurchasingOrdering bought-in parts, suppliers on the schedule
ManufacturingIn-house production with machine allocation and capacity control
AssemblyMechanical and electrical assembly, across trades
CommissioningTesting and running in the plant at the customer's site
Final acceptanceFinal handover with documented customer sign-off

The way out of Excel chaos

One data foundation for
all projects, departments, and resources

The solution isn't yet another Excel sheet, and it isn't an ERP add-on either. The ERP knows what already happened – not what happens if an order gets accepted tomorrow. Managing mechanical engineering projects needs its own forward-looking view.

Forecast planning in sales: check promised dates against real utilization before they're promised

Cross-project capacity view: see where the real bottlenecks are – and where capacity is free

Every department in one system: from design through commissioning, without maintaining triple the lists

Suppliers and subcontracted work visible in the plan, not in separate email threads

Simulate scenarios instead of debating them: model the best response to a delay or a failure in advance

For the first time, leadership, project management, and every department have full visibility into what's happening – without endlessly maintaining lists. And they're able to act: on new projects just as much as on incidents in ongoing operations. What such a switch looks like in practice is set out in the Schnaithmann Maschinenbau case study – an automation specialist that brought sales lists, the project plan and the departments’ Excel files together into one system. At MSG Solutions, project planning used to run across separate tools and lists; the case study shows how the old system was fully replaced. At LANG Technik, project plans are now created collaboratively across departments and tracked automatically.

Sales Excel
Assembly Excel
MS Project
One data foundation for every project
Sales
Project management
Departments
Employees

In practice

What mechanical engineers achieve with Linetrack

The benefit shows up exactly where Excel lists and gut feeling used to rule. In practice, status meetings are cut in half: the current state is available in the system at any time, instead of being pieced together weekly from scattered lists

Because bottlenecks and delays become visible earlier, responsiveness to disruptions improves noticeably – problems are anticipated instead of experienced. And because orders are checked against actual utilization, project costs fall: fewer unplanned subcontracts, fewer penalties from missed deadlines.

The most important effect can't be captured in a single number: leadership, project management, and every department have full visibility into what's happening for the first time – and they're able to act, on new projects just as much as on incidents in ongoing operations.

−50 %
status meetings
+25 %
faster response to disruptions
−5 %
project costs through fewer subcontracts
100 %
visibility instead of gut feeling

Customer experiences

What our customers in mechanical engineering say

One of these voices comes with the full story: the Krüger & Salecker case study – the forming-machine manufacturer from Bad Schwartau has tracked and managed its project data in one place since.

MSG Solutions uses Linetrack in project management and across departments to plan and steer projects efficiently. The system has completely replaced our old PM tool and now serves as the central platform for scheduling and resource planning.

Thanks to a shared data foundation, we always have a clear overview of the status of all projects and save significant time on portfolio analysis. The workflows are ideally matched to the requirements of mechanical and plant engineering – planning and decisions can be made in a practical, well-founded way as a result.

We especially appreciate the support: the Linetrack team responds quickly, is flexible with further development, and trains our staff in a hands-on way tailored to our processes. You can tell that real mechanical engineering experience goes into it.

Matthias Kramer

Managing Partner

MSG Solutions GmbH
MSG logo 1
Matthias Kramer

"Before Linetrack we used a project management system that didn't give us the transparency we needed in many areas. On top of that, different departments worked with their own isolated planning lists.

With Linetrack we were able to retire those workflows and now have professional, cross-department scheduling and resource planning – from the sales phase through to project tracking. We especially value the collaborative way of working and the close support from the Linetrack team, who adapted the software to our requirements, migrated our legacy data, and trained our staff.

Linetrack isn't just another tool for us – it's a solution that actually works."

Niklas Reitinger

Head of Project Management

Schnaithmann Maschinenbau GmbH
Schnaithmann
Niklas Reitinger

"Linetrack has helped us keep an overview of complex development and automation projects. Project plans are now created collaboratively across department boundaries and tracked automatically.

What convinces us most is the simple usability, combined with close contact with the Linetrack team. The flexible rollout and hands-on training meant our team adopted the solution quickly – a clear win for our work."

Philipp Lang

Management

LANG Technik GmbH
LANG
Philipp Lang

"As a mechanical engineering company, we always struggled to track and manage project data efficiently. With Linetrack we've not only brought transparency into our projects but also significantly increased our productivity.

What impressed us most was the user-friendliness and the way the data is presented, which let us always keep everything in view.

I can recommend Linetrack to other companies without reservation. It's easy to use, highly efficient, and has genuinely simplified our business.

Many thanks to the Linetrack team for a great solution and excellent support!"

Tammo Bettex

1/4

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions?

Book a time with our team.

What makes project management in mechanical engineering different from other industries?

In mechanical and plant engineering, a project spreads across many internal departments, the customer, and the supply chain – unlike construction, where the site is one shared place of work. On top of that come long durations, resources shared across projects, and constant changes from customer requests or supplier delays. That requires a connected view of schedules and capacity across every parallel project.

Why aren't MS Project or Excel enough in mechanical engineering?

MS Project and Excel plan individual projects, but they remain silos with no connection to the rest of the system landscape. They show no cross-project capacity and no overall picture across all initiatives. In mechanical engineering, where the same designers and fitters work on many projects at once, that leaves out exactly the information needed for reliable delivery dates.

Which mechanical engineering companies is Linetrack a good fit for?

For project-driven mechanical and plant engineering companies with several parallel projects and shared resources, regardless of size – Linetrack makes the biggest difference typically for organizations between 20 and 300 employees and up to over 30 departments, without that being a hard ceiling: Stadler Rail, a noticeably larger company, is among our reference customers too. The more custom the solution and the less it resembles series production, the greater the benefit. For pure series production without project character, Linetrack only makes sense in development projects.

How many projects can be managed in parallel with Linetrack?

Smaller mechanical engineering companies manage around 30 parallel projects with Linetrack on average, larger operations 150 to 200 – with project durations of 3 to 24 months. The cross-project view is preserved regardless of the number.

Why do project management rollouts in mechanical engineering often fail?

Common reasons are poor usability, no connection to the system landscape, excessive cost, and a rollout that never really works. Many systems ship with features that never get used. Linetrack relies on simple planning workflows and a phased rollout that doesn't overwhelm the company and reaches every department.

Does Linetrack replace the ERP system in mechanical engineering?

No. The ERP documents what has happened – Linetrack plans ahead for what happens once an order is accepted. The two complement each other: Linetrack connects to ERP and time-tracking systems via interfaces and delivers the cross-project planning and capacity view that the ERP doesn't provide.