Case study

Krüger & Salecker Maschinenbau: one work breakdown structure for every department with Linetrack

Tracking and managing project data was a long-standing difficulty, and the shared structure every department could work on at the same time was missing. Today the work breakdown structure sits in Linetrack – each department maintains its element, and the overall status follows from that.
  • Forming machines
  • Compact lines
  • Rolling and sprinkling machines
  • Extruders for pasty masses

What does Krüger & Salecker use Linetrack for?

Krüger & Salecker Maschinenbau, based in Bad Schwartau, builds forming machines for the food, pharma and petfood industries. The company plans its projects in Linetrack through a work breakdown structure: a standard plan based on its own template is divided into elements, the responsible departments maintain theirs and report progress there. The status of the whole project follows from that.

The company

What Krüger & Salecker builds

Robert Krüger and Heinrich Salecker founded the company on 1 July 1948 in a cellar workshop in Lübeck, where they first made pots, pans and cutlery. The first machine for the food industry followed in 1955 and moulded marzipan. Today the company is based in Bad Schwartau and builds forming machines that bring pasty, pourable and gel-like masses into shape – for confectionery and bar producers, for petfood, for pharma and nutraceuticals, and for the chemical industry.

An order is either a single machine or a complete line. The Compact Line, for instance, puts a forming machine, a casting machine and an enrobing machine in a row across just under eight metres, with two of the three units coming from other manufacturers. Design, manufacturing, assembly and commissioning at the customer's site interlock along the way, and part of the line sits with suppliers. That is exactly what Linetrack is built for in mechanical and plant engineering, including bringing suppliers into the same project plan.

Forming machine by Krüger & Salecker: infeed belt, forming unit with extraction hood, and discharge belt on a machine frame

Customer voice

“Everything always in view

„As a company in mechanical engineering, we always struggled to track and manage project data efficiently. With Linetrack, we've not only brought transparency to our projects but also significantly increased our productivity.

We were especially impressed by the usability and the way data is presented, which lets us keep everything in view at all times.

I can recommend Linetrack to other companies without reservation. It's easy to use, highly efficient, and has genuinely simplified our business.

Many thanks to the Linetrack team for a great solution and excellent support!“

Tammo Bettex, managing director of Krüger & Salecker Maschinenbau

The starting point

What was missing: a shared structure

Tammo Bettex names the starting point in the quote above: tracking and managing project data efficiently was always difficult for the company.

A template for how a work breakdown structure should be built already existed in house. What was missing was the system around it – a plan the different departments complete together, rather than each working on their own with the status collected afterwards.

Diagram: the template for the work breakdown structure sits on its own as a document, three departments keep their own notes beside it, and the connections between them are broken

The rollout

From the in-house template to a standard project plan

Krüger & Salecker came to Linetrack in 2023, the founding year, as the first customer. The company has worked with it continuously since.

The starting point was the template that already existed in house. From it came a standard project plan in Linetrack, divided into the elements of the work breakdown structure. Each element has a responsible department.

New projects have been created from that standard plan ever since. The departments work in their elements and report progress from there.

The collaboration also turned into product. From the start, Krüger & Salecker gave feedback from daily practice – what is easy to operate, what does not work, which functions are missing, and where time actually adds up. Part of what sits in the core of Linetrack today came out of that. How a rollout works in general is described under implementing Linetrack.

Diagram: the in-house template becomes the standard project plan, which breaks down into elements of the work breakdown structure with one responsible department each, whose progress reports add up to the overall status

The solution

What runs differently today

The work breakdown structure is the core. Four things hang off it.

A standard plan instead of a blank sheet

New projects are created from a standard project plan based on Krüger & Salecker's own template. The breakdown is there before the first date is set, and it looks the same in every project – which is what makes projects comparable with one another. See collaborative coarse and detailed planning.

Pattern for problem cards.

Each department maintains its element

The plan is divided into elements, each with a responsible department. That is where the work happens and where the progress report comes from – on the same plan, not on a copy of it. See collaborative project management and tasks and tracking.

Pattern for problem cards.

The overall status is computed from the elements

Because the departments report in their own elements, the status of the whole project is available at any time, and alongside it, where each department stands within it. The status report is the system state, not the result of a chasing round. See multi-project management.

Pattern for problem cards.

A plan that does not go stale

A work breakdown structure built at kick-off and then left alone stops describing anything after a few weeks. Here the departments keep it current as they work, because reporting is the same gesture as doing the work. See project planning and control.

Pattern for problem cards.

The result

One plan every department stands on

Three things hold today.

What holds today

A standard project plan from the in-house template

The template that already existed in house is the blueprint for new projects in Linetrack – divided into the elements of the work breakdown structure.

Departments report their own progress

Each element has a responsible department. Progress comes from there rather than being collected by someone.

An overview of the whole project

The status of the overall project is available at any time, and alongside it, where each department stands within it.

Frequent questions

Questions about the work breakdown structure in mechanical engineering

Your projects, not our demo dataset

30 minutes on one of your real project examples. After that you will know whether the planning logic fits your order structure.

What does Krüger & Salecker use Linetrack for?

For the work breakdown structure. A standard plan based on the in-house template is divided into elements, each element has a responsible department, and the departments report progress there. The status of the overall project follows from that. Krüger & Salecker has worked with Linetrack since 2023.

What is a work breakdown structure, and how do several departments fill it together?

A work breakdown structure divides a project into phases, sub-projects and work packages. It is filled together when each element has a responsible department and that department maintains its progress directly on the element. The plan stays a single plan – nobody works on a copy that would have to be merged later. The individual components are set out under project planning and control.

How do you keep track of project data across several machine projects?

By hanging the data on the tasks rather than on status reports. Dates, progress and responsibility sit on the project, and every overview is computed from them. As soon as the status comes out of a chasing round, it is already old by the time anyone reads it – with projects running in parallel, that shows up first. There is more detail under project tracking in mechanical engineering.

Why is Excel not enough for a work breakdown structure?

A spreadsheet can be structured, but it cannot be updated by several departments at once without copies appearing. And it maps no dependency between plans: as soon as two projects draw on the same design team, that appears in no file. 91 % of Linetrack customers named a mix of Excel and single-purpose tools as their starting point. The comparison is under Linetrack vs. Excel.

How long does it take to implement Linetrack?

Across all productive implementations, the median from kick-off to the first genuinely planned project is ten working days, regardless of company size. The rollout across all areas takes longer and depends on how much legacy data is migrated and how the training is scheduled. The sequence is described under implementing Linetrack.

Does Linetrack suit food machinery manufacturing as well?

The planning logic follows the order structure, not the end product. A forming machine for bars and an assembly system for electronics share the traits that matter here: customer-specific design, departments shared across several orders, and supplier parts inside the schedule. That is described under mechanical and plant engineering and, for the high engineering share, under special-purpose machinery.