Industry focus

Project management for
development and internal projects

There is no customer chasing the deadline on a development project. Half the departments contribute anyway, and every one of them has to report its status back. Linetrack collects that status automatically instead of leaving the project manager to phone it together.
A development workstation from above: assembly drawings with section and detail views laid out on the desk, with a caliper resting on the drawing of a chassis module

In short

Development projects and internal projects have one thing in common: there is no external client enforcing the deadline. A new product, a production ramp-up, a plant of your own, a certification – the client sits inside the company. The departments involved are ones for which the project is not the main job, and that is exactly why tracking it costs more time than planning it. Linetrack addresses that point: everyone involved gets their task with an automatic reminder, reports their status there, and the schedule recalculates from it. InVENTer GmbH and LANG Technik plan their development projects this way.

StadlerSTOLLSchnaithmannMSGLANG TECHNIKInVENTerKSKSCHIRMACHERVOWEMAKrüger & SaleckerBAVIUSSAMALPHA PLANSCHAUENBURGGRÜBL Automatisierungstechnik GmbHbpmHywaxPGA AnlagenbauKSK AutomationProla Automation
StadlerSTOLLSchnaithmannMSGLANG TECHNIKInVENTerKSKSCHIRMACHERVOWEMAKrüger & SaleckerBAVIUSSAMALPHA PLANSCHAUENBURGGRÜBL Automatisierungstechnik GmbHbpmHywaxPGA AnlagenbauKSK AutomationProla Automation

4000 +

completed
industrial projects

270 +

parallel projects
at a single customer

1512 +

projects steered
in parallel

10

working days to your
first own project

*Full survey of all productive Linetrack implementations across every industry, as of August 2026. No separate figures exist for development and internal projects alone – these numbers back the platform, not this segment.

Planning requirements

Why internal projects
are harder to steer

A customer order disciplines the plan from outside. When that pressure is absent, the structure has to replace it. Four patterns repeat in development and internal projects.

No customer is chasing the deadline

A late customer order has a sender who gets in touch. A late development project does not. It slips the moment day-to-day business calls, and nobody outside the project notices.

Pattern for problem cards.

The departments involved treat the project as a side job

Design, purchasing, production, quality and sales all contribute without being assigned to the project. Their feedback has to come out of their own working day, not as an extra task somebody reminds them about every week.

Pattern for problem cards.

Tracking costs more time than planning

The plan is done in two days. Then the work that really eats time begins: asking, reminding, collecting, updating. In the customer survey, 59 % of companies name manual status enquiries as a starting problem.

Pattern for problem cards.

Internal projects tie up capacity that is missing elsewhere

Whoever is booked on the development project is unavailable to the customer project. Because the internal project appears on no order list, that load only surfaces once the customer deadline tips over.

Pattern for problem cards.

The mechanism

The status comes to you,
not you to the status

A single milestone depends on input from half a dozen departments. Collecting that input is the real work on a development project. That is exactly the part Linetrack takes over.

Ahead of an approval date, the status is therefore a view and not a collection exercise. How the tracking works in detail is on the project control page.

Island solutions that only fix
half the problem

Many project management systems come with an enormous range of functions – which in practice is nowhere near fully used. The reasons are always the same: poor usability, long loading times, no connection to the existing system landscape, costs that are too high, inadequate training and a rollout that never really worked. What is left is an expensive system nobody uses.

Linetrack came about differently: founders Michael and Thomas Sindlinger are mechanical engineers themselves. Linetrack grew out of exactly these problems – we understand our customers' challenges from our own experience, not from a market analysis. And we do not leave our customers alone with the rollout. Linetrack is rolled out together with the company so that it works in every department afterwards – in stages, without overwhelming the organisation. That is where most project management rollouts fail. For us it is the core of how we work.

In development departments a second island is added. Next to the schedule sits the PLM system, next to that the development team's task list, next to that production's Excel file. Each of those systems knows part of the project, none of them the state of the whole. At InVENTer no legacy data was migrated for that reason: the staff built their project plans in Linetrack themselves, and the first plan in the system is the same one they have worked with ever since. Which categories of system exist and where their limits lie is set out in multi-project management software compared.

Previous tools
UsabilityComplex, functions barely used
SpeedLong loading times
System integrationAn island, no connection
CostHigh, often oversized
RolloutOften fails, poor training
Status collectionReminders and follow-ups by hand
UsabilitySimple, focused planning workflows
SpeedFast and lean
System integrationConnected to the system landscape
CostSized to what is actually needed
RolloutStaged, supported rollout
Status collectionAutomatic, replies go into the plan

How that supported rollout works in practice – from the review in the first conversation through the planning exercise to migrating live plans – is on the rolling out Linetrack page.

A development project from concept to production ramp-up

Across the whole cycle – every phase with its own dates, approvals and status replies in one system.

At the end there is a product that goes into series production. The path there is a project following the classic phase-gate pattern: each phase ends in a decision point where the project is continued, reworked or stopped. Every one of those decisions needs a reliable status from all the departments involved.

This is precisely where separate lists fail. They hold one department's tasks, but not the handover to the next. In Linetrack the whole cycle sits in one plan, with each department's replies attached to the task itself. If testing runs late, the production ramp-up visibly moves with it – rather than surfacing once sales has already announced the launch date.

ConceptIdea, requirements specification and rough schedule
ApprovalSteering committee decision, budget and go-ahead
DesignMechanical, electrical and software design in parallel
PrototypePrototype build and first samples out of production
TestingTrials, certification and documented results
Series releaseQuality, purchasing and production sign the product off
Ramp-upTooling, production equipment and the production ramp

The way out of Excel chaos

One data base for
every phase, department and open point

The solution is not another task list alongside the PLM system. PLM holds the product data – it does not tell you whether testing is on schedule and who still owes something. A development project needs its own forward-looking view for that.

Automatic status collection: reminders run out of the plan instead of the project manager following up

Each department maintains its own element: design, purchasing, production and quality work in the same plan without overwriting one another

Open points, comments and files sit on the project rather than in email threads – this is how InVENTer works today

Cross-project capacity view: see what the internal project ties up in engineers before the customer deadline tips over

One view of every development project in flight, instead of laying six schedules side by side

For the first time management, project managers and departments all see where things stand – without maintaining lists or starting a round of enquiries. What such a switch looks like in practice is shown by the InVENTer case study – the ventilation manufacturer from Löberschütz near Jena used to track large development projects through reminders and follow-ups, and today has the plan, the status and the open points in the same place. At LANG Technik project plans are created collaboratively across departments and tracked automatically, with development keeping the overview across every project.

Excel development
Task list
PLM system
One data base for every development project
Management
Project managers
Departments
Staff

In practice

What development departments achieve with Linetrack

The benefit shows up where reminders and follow-ups used to set the pace. In practice, status meetings halve: the current state is in the system at any time instead of being pulled together weekly from scattered lists.

Because delays become visible earlier, responsiveness rises noticeably. On a development project that counts most before the gates: knowing two weeks before series release that testing is running late means the ramp-up can still be steered rather than merely postponed.

The most important effect cannot be put in a single number: management, project managers and departments see for the first time where things stand – and can decide, at the gates as well as when something goes wrong mid-project.

−50 %
status meetings
+25 %
faster response to delays
59 %
of customers came from manual status enquiries
100 %
visibility instead of chasing rounds

Customer voices

What our customers in development departments say

The full story behind the first quote is in the InVENTer case study.

„At InVENTer GmbH, we develop ventilation systems for residential buildings and manage many cross-departmental projects.

Before Linetrack, the biggest challenge was that constant reminders and follow-ups were needed to keep track of tasks. With Linetrack, we were able to significantly reduce this effort: reminders now run automatically, and the team works noticeably more productively.

Rolling out the system was easy, the support from Linetrack was excellent - and it's so intuitive to use that everyone got up to speed quickly. We especially appreciate that the training module is available at any time.“

Annette Wettig

Managing Director

InVENTer GmbH
InVENTer
Annette Wettig

„Linetrack has helped us keep track of complex development and automation projects. Project plans are now created collaboratively across departments and tracked automatically.

What convinces us most is the ease of use, combined with close contact with the Linetrack team. The flexible rollout and hands-on training meant our team adopted the solution quickly - a clear added value for our work.“

Philipp Lang

Management

LANG Technik GmbH
LANG Technik
Philipp Lang

1/2

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions?

Book a slot with our team.

What makes an internal project different from a customer project?

The client. On a customer project a contract sets the deadline and somebody outside chases it. On development and internal projects the client sits inside the company, usually management or a steering committee. The deadline is just as binding, but nobody calls when it slips. That is why the emphasis here is on continuous transparency about status, less on defending a date against a customer.

How does Linetrack get status out of departments that are not part of the project team?

Through the task itself. Every department involved sees only its own work packages in the shared plan and reports progress, open points and delays there. As a deadline approaches, the reminder goes out automatically. The project status follows from those replies – the project manager does not have to start a round of enquiries, and nobody has to write a separate status report. How the tracking works in detail is covered under project control.

Do the dates really update by themselves?

The dates do, the decision does not. When a department reports a delay on its task, that travels through the dependencies into the downstream work packages and the critical path recalculates. Which gate is now at risk becomes visible straight away. What follows from that – replanning, adding capacity, moving the date – is decided by the project manager, not by the system.

Are there reference customers from development departments?

Yes, two with exactly this profile. InVENTer GmbH plans and tracks large development projects with many departments involved in Linetrack. LANG Technik plans development and automation projects across departments in it. Both cases are documented as case studies on the Referenzen page.

Can the production ramp-up be planned as well?

Yes. The ramp-up is part of the development project and is planned as its own phase, covering tooling, production equipment and the production ramp. What comes after that, ongoing series production, is no longer a project and does not belong in Linetrack but in ERP or MES detailed scheduling.

Does Linetrack replace our PLM system?

No. Linetrack is a project control system, not a PLM or requirements management system. It plans and tracks deadlines, approvals and status replies for the work packages of a development project. Product data, bills of materials, revision levels and requirements stay with the PLM or requirements management system.

Does Linetrack support a phase-gate process?

Yes. The phases sit as sections in the work breakdown structure, and the gate at the end of each phase as a milestone the contributions from the departments involved hang on. Ahead of a gate it is therefore readable what is still open and with whom it sits. The decision at the gate itself – continue, rework or stop – is made by the committee; Linetrack supplies the basis for it.

What about specialists split between a development project and day-to-day business?

They show up with their real workload in every project they are booked on. That makes visible what internal projects tie up in capacity – before the customer deadline tips over, not after. How this portfolio view across all parallel projects works is described on the multi-project management page.